中文翻译：

我经常听到的一个批评，说我们的士兵不应该占据医院、学校或类似的建筑，因为这样会吸引俄罗斯的火力。今天我想解释一下这到底是怎么回事...

在战场前线，建筑物都是废弃的，学校、公寓楼和医院之间没有任何区别，它们只是不再具有任何功能的废弃建筑物。因此，出于军事需求考虑，我们不得不占据它们。举例来说，如果我们仅仅是依靠一般房舍而不是混凝土建造的医院，这可能意味着生与死的区别。医院往往是坚固的老式苏联钢筋混泥土建筑，可以抵御炮火。相反，一般房屋则要脆弱得多，它们不仅空间狭窄，在受到炮火的短暂攻击后就可能被摧毁或者起火。另外，占据一座坚固的建筑物可以为我们提供更开阔的视野，覆盖更多的道路，为我们的战友提供占领其他建筑物的机会。

如果是在后方，情况就不同了，我们就不会进入医院和学校，因为这些建筑还在使用，俄国人也知道这一点，那么他们就没有充分的军事理由来轰炸这些地方。

原文：

A criticism that I often hear is that we soldiers should not occupy hospitals, schools or similar buildings, as this attracts Russian fire. Let me explain how things work...

On the front line, the buildings are abandoned. There is no difference between a school, an apartment block and a hospital. They are just abandoned buildings that no longer fulfill any function. We must therefore occupy them according to our military needs. If for example we occupy houses and refuse to occupy a concrete hospital, it could mean the difference between life and death. The hospital is probably a sturdy old Soviet building made of concrete that resists shelling. Houses, on the contrary, are small, fragile buildings that are destroyed and catch fire after a few minutes of an artillery barrage. In addition, occupying a building allows you to cover certain roads or protect other buildings occupied by our comrades.

Behind the front line, things are different. We then do not occupy hospitals and schools, because these buildings are still in use. The Russians know this. There is then no good military reason to bomb these places.